Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Cunningham v. Hastings

556 N.E.2d 12 (1990)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Cunningham v. Hastings

Court of Appeals of Indiana

556 N.E.2d 12 (1990)

Facts

In 1984, property was deeded to Joan Cunningham (plaintiff) and Warren Hastings (defendant), as “joint tenants with right of survivorship, and NOT as tenants in common.” Cunningham and Hastings were not married. When the relationship between Cunningham and Hastings ended, Hastings took sole possession of the property. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. The trial court held that Cunningham and Hastings were joint tenants and ordered sale of the property. The trial court further held that the sale proceeds first go to covering the costs of the legal proceedings. The next $45,000 would go to Hastings as a refund of the purchase price Hastings paid for the property. The remainder was to be divided between Cunningham and Hastings equally. Cunningham appealed the trial court’s award of $45,000 to Hastings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)

Concurrence (Ratliff, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership