Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
37 F.Supp. 2d 687 (1999)


Facts

Tai Kwan Cureton (plaintiff) and Leatrice Shaw (plaintiff) were talented high school track and field runners who were heavily recruited by Division I colleges around the country. However, because neither was able to achieve the minimum SAT or ACT test scores required by National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (defendant) rules, each was ineligible to participate in NCAA athletics. Shaw nevertheless secured an athletic scholarship from Miami University as a “partial qualifier,” but was not eligible to compete during her freshman year. Cureton ended up at Division III Wheaton College, which did not offer any athletic scholarships. Cureton and Shaw, and other student-athletes brought suit against the NCAA, alleging that its minimum test score rule violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. Both parties brought cross-motions for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Buckwalter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.