Curran v. Barefoot
North Carolina Court of Appeals
183 N.C. App. 331, 645 S.E.2d 187 (2007)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Robert Barefoot (defendant) owned a furnished vacation home by a lake (the lake house). Barefoot entered a contract to sell the lake house to Thomas and Josephine Curran (plaintiffs). In an addendum to the contract, Barefoot agreed to convey all furnishings, linens, window treatments, appliances, dishes, art, and various other categories of items currently in the lake house to the Currans. Barefoot further agreed to convey all “watercraft” at the lake house to the Currans. On the date set for closing, Barefoot refused to tender and convey the agreed-upon property. The Currans sued Barefoot seeking specific performance of the contract. The trial court found a breach of contract and that money damages would not be an adequate remedy and, accordingly, granted specific performance. Barefoot appealed, arguing that specific performance was not an appropriate remedy for a contract involving personal property and, further, that he did not hold title to the watercraft. An affidavit supported that Barefoot did not own the watercraft.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tyson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.