Currens v. Sleek
Washington Supreme Court
983 P.2d 626 (1999)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The Currenses (plaintiffs) owned a property next to property owned by Irene Sleek (defendant). Sleek’s property was on land that was higher than the Currenses property, and water naturally flowed down onto the Currenses property. Sleek cleared a portion of her property of trees and graded it, in order to develop four home sites. This altered the flow of water, and a portion of the Currenses’ land flooded. The flooding caused 11 trees to fall, and the Currenses removed an additional 20 trees to ensure the safety of their home. The Currenses sued Sleek for the damage caused by the flooding. The trial court granted summary judgment to Sleek, and the Currenses appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)
Dissent (Sanders, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.