Currier v. First Resolution Investment Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
762 F.3d 529 (2014)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Roslyn Currier (plaintiff) sued First Resolution Investment Corp. (Resolution) (defendant), a debt collector, in federal district court, alleging that Resolution had violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the act). Previously, in 2012, Resolution had brought an action in Kentucky state court against Currier to collect a charged-off credit card debt. After Currier’s counsel failed to appear at a hearing, default judgment was entered by the state court. Currier filed a motion to vacate the default judgment. As of the date of that filing, the judgment against Currier was not final, because under Kentucky law the motion to vacate rendered the judgment nonfinal. Resolution then filed a judgment lien against Currier’s home. The lien was invalid because, under Kentucky law, a judgment lien can only arise from a final judgment. On October 29, 2012, a state judge granted Currier’s motion to vacate the default judgment. Resolution held the invalid lien for a month before releasing it. In the subsequent federal lawsuit, Currier claimed that Resolution’s invalid lien violated the act. The district court dismissed Currier’s claim. Currier appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stranch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.