Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts

351 F.2d 702 (1965)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
351 F.2d 702 (1965)

Facts

On March 23, 1963, Curtis Publishing Co. (Curtis) (plaintiff) published an article in an issue of the Saturday Evening Post claiming that Wally Butts (defendant), the Athletic Director at the University of Georgia, rigged a game the previous fall. Butts brought suit against Curtis Publishing Co., alleging that the article was libelous. At trial, the testimony made clear that Curtis had knowingly published false information. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Butts, finding $460,000 in general damages and $3,000,000 in punitive damages. Curtis made a motion for a new trial based on the size of the punitive damages awarded, which was granted conditioned upon Butts’ failure to remit the portion of the award above $400,000. Another motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict made by Curtis was denied. Butts filed a remittitur, and a judgment for Butts in the amount of $460,000 was entered. Curtis filed a motion under Rule 60(b) for a new trial and was denied. Curtis appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Spears, J.)

Dissent (Rives, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership