Cushman v. Kirby
Supreme Court of Vermont
536 A.2d 550 (1987)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Kirbys (defendants) sold a house to the Cushmans (plaintiffs). During negotiations, the Cushmans asked the Kirbys about the quality of water in the house and Mrs. Kirby stated that the water was hard, but that it was treatable, and otherwise okay. Mr. Kirby heard this statement and said nothing in response. In fact, the water was sulfuric, a fact that both Kirbys knew, but did not disclose. The Cushmans relied on Mrs. Kirby’s statement to purchase the house. When they moved in, the Cushmans noticed that the water tasted and smelled bad. They hired a plumber who confirmed that the water was sulfuric. Subsequently, the Cushmans paid to hook the house up to the water supply of a nearby town. The Cushmans then brought suit for misrepresentation. The trial court found in favor of the Cushmans and the Kirbys appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dooley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
