Custodian of Absentee Property v. Samara
Israel Supreme Court
CA 25/55, 10 PD 1825 (1956)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Israel and Jordan entered into the Rhodes Agreement following the Israeli War of Independence, under which the governments exchanged certain territories. Before the exchange of territories, Samara and two other individuals (plaintiffs) claimed rights to land that was ultimately transferred to Israel by Jordan under the Rhodes Agreement. However, the Rhodes Agreement was not adopted into law by the Israeli legislature. Samara and the others brought a claim against the custodian of absentee property (defendant), claiming rights to the property in the newly Israeli territory.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Berenson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.