D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co.
Florida Supreme Court
806 So.2d 424 (2001)
Facts
Harris (plaintiff) was riding as a passenger in a car manufactured by Ford (defendant). The driver of the car was intoxicated and driving at an excessive speed when he crashed into a tree. The car caught on fire and exploded, causing serious injuries to Harris. Harris and his mother, D’Amario (plaintiff), brought a strict liability claim against Ford, alleging that the car’s relay switch was defective because it continued to pump fuel after the collision, which caused the explosion. Harris did not seek damages for his injuries caused by the initial accident, but only for the secondary injuries caused by the explosion and defective relay switch. During trial, Ford asserted an affirmative defense of comparative fault, alleging that the jury should consider the driver’s negligence in causing the initial accident. The court allowed evidence of the driver’s intoxication and excessive speed, and the jury returned a verdict for Ford. The trial court judge granted a new trial, but the appellate court reversed, upholding the verdict in favor of Ford.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
