D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co.

806 So.2d 424 (2001)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
D
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co.

Florida Supreme Court
806 So.2d 424 (2001)

Facts

Harris (plaintiff) was riding as a passenger in a car manufactured by Ford (defendant). The driver of the car was intoxicated and driving at an excessive speed when he crashed into a tree. The car caught on fire and exploded, causing serious injuries to Harris. Harris and his mother, D’Amario (plaintiff), brought a strict liability claim against Ford, alleging that the car’s relay switch was defective because it continued to pump fuel after the collision, which caused the explosion. Harris did not seek damages for his injuries caused by the initial accident, but only for the secondary injuries caused by the explosion and defective relay switch. During trial, Ford asserted an affirmative defense of comparative fault, alleging that the jury should consider the driver’s negligence in causing the initial accident. The court allowed evidence of the driver’s intoxication and excessive speed, and the jury returned a verdict for Ford. The trial court judge granted a new trial, but the appellate court reversed, upholding the verdict in favor of Ford.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms