From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
D.S. v. New York City Deptartment of Education
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
255 F.R.D. 59 (2008)
A group of minority students and their parents (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the New York City Department of Education (defendant). The plaintiffs were students at Boys & Girls High School (the School) and alleged that the School deliberately denied the plaintiffs a high school education. The population of the School was 99.4 percent minority, and 62 percent of the students were at or below the poverty level. The plaintiffs alleged that approximately 500 students were placed on modified schedules that did not provide adequate daily instruction to progress toward a high school diploma. The plaintiffs also alleged that the School improperly denied registered students access to the school. The plaintiffs further alleged that School discouraged student attendance by seizing students’ winter coats and identification cards required to enter the school building. The plaintiffs asserted that the School, as a result of its actions, violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to provide an equal opportunity for students of all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. The School and the plaintiffs reached a proposed settlement and requested approval of the settlement from the court. As part of the settlement, the School agreed to an injunction against wrongfully excluding present and future students. The School also agreed to inform students of their rights to educational services and to follow specific protective measures prior to excluding any student from educational services or transferring or discharging any students from the School. The School consented to monitoring and additional training for staff. The School also agreed to provide additional services to a subclass of students adversely affected by the School’s actions, such as vocational and career training, counseling, literacy programs, and guidance and academic support services.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Weinstein, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.