Dade County School Board v. Radio Station WQBA
Florida Supreme Court
731 So. 2d 638 (1999)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Radio Station WQBA (WQBA) (defendant) ran Miami’s annual Three Kings Day Parade as a promotional event. Dade County School Board (the Board) (plaintiff) purchased an advertising package from WQBA. Under the package, WQBA would select a high-school marching band to carry the Board’s banner in the parade. The Board’s participation agreement with WQBA contained an indemnification clause stating that the Board would indemnify WQBA against any claim resulting from “our participation and actions” during the parade. It was not specified whether the “our” in the indemnification clause applied to the Board or to both the Board and the marching band selected to carry the Board’s banner. During the parade, the marching band carrying the Board’s banner used flaming batons, which ultimately caused severe burn injuries to parade spectators. The injured spectators sued the Board and WQBA for negligence. WQBA filed a crossclaim against the Board for common-law immunity and contractual immunity, arguing that the Board was entirely at fault for the spectator’s injuries. Based on the indemnification clause, the trial court granted WQBA summary judgment on its contractual indemnity claim. The common-law indemnity claim proceeded to trial. After trial, despite finding there was no special relationship between the Board and WQBA, the trial court ruled in WQBA’s favor on the common-law indemnity claim, holding that the Board and the marching band were at fault for the spectator’s injuries, not WQBA. The Board appealed. The appellate court held that WQBA was not entitled to common-law indemnification because it lacked a special relationship with the Board. Regardless, the appellate court held that WQBA was still entitled to relief on other grounds unrelated to indemnification. The Board appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harding, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.