From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
259 N.J. Super. 17, 611 A.2d 136 (1992)
Dafler (plaintiff) brought suit against several manufacturers, including Keene Corporation (Keene) (defendant), alleging that he developed asbestosis and lung cancer as a result of exposure to asbestos during his employment at the New York Shipyard. Dafler admitted that he had smoked cigarettes for almost 45 years until he was diagnosed with asbestosis. Dafler presented two medical experts who testified that the relationship between cigarette smoking and asbestos exposure is synergistic and that Dafler’s lung cancer was caused by the interaction of the two. The doctors testified as to the risk of developing lung cancer from cigarette smoking, industrial exposure to asbestos, and a combination of the two. Keene presented a medical expert, who testified that Dafler’s lung cancer was completely caused by smoking. None of the doctors spoke to apportionment. The jury apportioned the damages for Dafler’s lung cancer by determining that cigarette smoking was responsible for two-thirds of the lung cancer and the asbestos exposure was responsible for the other third. Both Dafler and Keene appealed. Dafler argued that there was insufficient evidence to allow the jury to apportion damages for his lung cancer and that Keene did not show a reasonable basis for apportionment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.