Dahl v. Hem Pharmaceuticals Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
7 F.3d 1399 (1999)
Dahl and several others (the patients) (plaintiffs) suffered from chronic fatigue syndrome. The patients participated in a double-blind experiment by HEM Pharmaceuticals Corp. (HEM) (defendant) to test Ampligen, a new medication. HEM promised to provide a years’ supply of Ampligen to any patient who completed the testing. The patients were free to withdraw from the experiment at any time. Over the course of several months, the patients were given either periodic injections of Ampligen or a saline solution. At the end of the testing, the Federal Drug Administration determined that Ampligen was not safe for use, but that testing could continue. HEM refused to provide the years’ supply of Ampligen to the patients who had completed the trials. The patients brought an action against HEM to compel it to provide the medication.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.