Dalarna Farms v. Access Energy Corp.
Iowa Supreme Court
792 N.W.2d 656 (2010)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Dalarna Farms (Dalarna) (plaintiff) operated a dairy farm near Access Energy Corporation’s (AEC) (defendant) preexisting electrical utility system. Dalarna’s dairy herd experienced significant health problems because of stray voltage originating from AEC’s electric utility. Dalarna filed a nuisance action against AEC seeking compensation for past and future damages, including for the diminution in Dalarna’s property value. AEC filed a motion for an advisory ruling, arguing that Iowa’s comparative-fault statute should be interpreted to apply to all types of damages awarded to redress a preexisting permanent nuisance. Dalarna challenged, arguing that applying comparative-fault principles to reduce the damages awarded to compensate Dalarna for the diminution in Dalarna’s property value would violate the Takings Clause. The trial court held that, under Iowa law, comparative-fault principles could only be applied to reduce any future damages Dalarna was awarded in lieu of injunctive relief and that comparative-fault principles did not apply to damages awarded for diminution in property value. AEC filed an interlocutory appeal with the Iowa Supreme Court challenging the trial court’s interpretation of Iowa’s comparative-fault statute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.