Daley v. LaCroix
Michigan Supreme Court
179 N.W.2d 390 (Mich. 1970)
LaCroix (defendant) lost control of his car and it went off the road, hitting a utility pole and causing an electrical explosion where power lines met the Daleys’ home. The Daleys experienced emotional distress resulting from experiencing the explosion and brought the testimony of medical experts to show that the distress was accompanied by physical symptoms. Among the Daleys’ ailments were traumatic neurosis, emotional disturbance, and nervous upset. The Daleys brought suit for the property damage as well as emotional distress they incurred as a result of the explosion. The trial court granted LaCroix a directed verdict and the court of appeals affirmed. The Daleys appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kavanagh, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.