Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

143 S. Ct. 1075 (2023)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

United States Supreme Court
143 S. Ct. 1075 (2023)

Facts

In 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (defendant) approved a drug called mifepristone, which was used to terminate early pregnancy. The approval included conditions intended to promote patient safety. In 2016 and 2021, the FDA amended the conditions, making them more lenient. Additionally, in 2019, the FDA approved a generic version of mifepristone. A collection of medical groups opposed to chemical abortion (plaintiffs), including Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, sued the FDA in federal district court challenging the FDA’s approvals, conditions, and modifications concerning mifepristone. Danco Laboratories, LLC (Danco) (defendant), the manufacturer of mifepristone, intervened in the suit as a defendant. The medical groups moved for a preliminary injunction suspending all of the FDA’s actions regarding mifepristone while the suit was pending. Instead, the district court considered the merits of the case and issued a stay of the FDA’s actions, which effectively undid mifepristone’s approval and thus prevented its use. The FDA and Danco appealed to the Fifth Circuit, asking the court to stay the district court’s order, and thus reinstate the FDA’s actions and allow the use of mifepristone while an appeal on the merits was pending in the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit granted the stay regarding the FDA’s original 2000 approval of mifepristone but denied the stay as to the FDA’s other actions, meaning that the district court’s order continued to effectively undo the FDA’s subsequent modifications of the drug’s conditions and approval of a generic equivalent. Although the Fifth Circuit fast-tracked the appeal on the merits, the FDA and Danco sought emergency relief from the Supreme Court. Just two days after the Fifth Circuit’s decision regarding the stay, the FDA and Danco filed an application with the Supreme Court, via Justice Alito, asking the Supreme Court to stay the district court’s order in its entirety while the appeal on the merits was pending.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Dissent (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership