Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Daniel v. Bank of Hayward

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
425 N.W.2d 416 (1988)


Facts

Joseph and Marijane Daniel (plaintiffs) purchased a Chevrolet van from Don Hofstadter, Inc. (Hofstadter) to be manufactured by General Motors (GM). Under the purchase contract, the Daniels traded in their motor home, the value of which was applied to the $12,077.55 purchase price of the van. After the trade-in, the Daniels still owed an outstanding balance of $3,402. Because the van had not yet been manufactured, the contract did not include a vehicle identification number. Hofstadter worked with Bank of Hayward (Bank) (defendant) to obtain financing for the Daniels’ van. According to ordinary procedure, GM sent a sight draft to the Bank for the van. Hofstadter executed a $9,905.22 note prepared by the Bank, which also conveyed a security interest in the van to the Bank. GM then delivered the van to Hofstadter. Thereafter, the Bank learned that Hofstadter was removing vehicles from the dealership lot that were securing the Bank’s loan to Hofstadter. The Bank responded by preventing the removal of any vehicles from the lot. When the Daniels went to pick up the van, the Bank refused to tender possession unless the Daniels paid the Bank’s entire $9,905.22 interest, even though the Daniels owed only $3,402 to Hofstadter. The Daniels borrowed the $9,905.22 sum from the Bank and obtained possession. The Daniels brought suit against the Bank to recover the overpayment. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Bank. The state supreme court granted the Daniels’ petition to bypass.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.