Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co.
New York City Civil Court
137 Misc. 2d 94, 520 N.Y.S.2d 334 (1987)
- Written by Tom Squier, JD
Facts
In September 1986, Elridge Daniel (plaintiff), a securities investor, subscribed to an interactive, computer news-delivery service offered by Dow Jones & Co. (Dow Jones) (defendant). The service relied on emerging technology that utilized computer-to-computer connections using modems and telephone lines. A subscriber to Dow Jones’s service could connect to Dow Jones’s computers and send requests for various kinds of news articles, and the service would then send the requested articles to the subscriber. The service cost $3 per minute of use. At some point, Daniel used the service to access a news article that described the restructuring of Husky Oil, a Canadian company. The article did not mention that the monetary amounts described were in Canadian dollars rather than United States dollars. Based on the information in the article, Daniel made investment decisions that were ultimately negative for him. Daniel sued Dow Jones for negligently publishing false and misleading statements, claiming that Dow Jones was liable for Daniel’s losses. Dow Jones moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.