Daniels v. FanDuel, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
909 F.3d 876 (2018)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
FanDuel and DraftKings (defendants) used the names, pictures, and statistics of sports players without the players’ consent to operate online fantasy-sports games. Contestants were generally required to pay to enter the fantasy-sports games and form or draft a “fantasy” team, and cash prizes were distributed to winning contestants. Three former college-football players (the athletes) (plaintiffs) sued FanDuel and DraftKings in federal court alleging violations of their right of publicity based on Indiana law. The Seventh Circuit certified a question to the Indiana Supreme Court as to whether, under state law, online fantasy-sports-game operators needed the consent of athletes to use those athletes’ names, pictures, and statistics. The Indiana Supreme Court answered that Indiana’s right-of-publicity statute contained an exception for material with newsworthy value, including the data used in online fantasy contests. The Seventh Circuit was required to decide whether the athletes could maintain their suit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.