Daniels v. Walt Disney Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
958 F.3d 767 (2020)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
In 2005, Denise Daniels (plaintiff), an expert on children’s emotional development, created a line of anthropomorphic characters called the Moodsters. The Moodsters were five color-coded characters, each representing a different emotion: pink—love, yellow—happiness, blue—sadness, red—anger, and green—fear. Daniels developed a television pilot featuring the Moodsters in 2007 and a line of toys and books that were sold at Target and other retailers beginning in 2015. The physical appearance of the Moodsters changed over time. In early iterations, they were insect-like with skinny bodies and tall antennae that glowed when a strong emotion was felt, and each Moodster was prone to a particular emotion. Later, they resembled small bears who wore detective hats and capes and were depicted as “mood detectives” helping a child discover his feelings about different situations. The characters had different names in different iterations. Daniels and her team pitched the Moodsters to various entertainment and toy companies, including the Walt Disney Company (Disney) (defendant) and Disney’s affiliate Pixar. In 2010, Pixar began development of the movie Inside Out, which was released in 2015 and was about an 11-year-old girl and five anthropomorphized emotions living inside her mind: joy, fear, sadness, disgust, and anger. The film’s director and co-writer, Pete Docter, said his inspiration was the way in which his daughter dealt with her emotions. Daniels sued Disney for copyright infringement. The district court granted Disney’s motion to dismiss, and Daniels appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKeown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.