Danzig v. Danzig
Washington Court of Appeals
904 P.2d 312 (1995)
Steven Danzig (plaintiff) was approached by an attorney, Jeffrey Danzig (defendant), to solicit legal clients in exchange for one-third of the client’s fee. Washington law prohibited attorneys from entering this type of agreement. Additionally, these agreements were a violation of the rules of professional conduct for attorneys in the State of Washington. Steven solicited several clients and billed Jeffrey at an hourly rate that always approximately equaled one-third of the client’s fee. In March 1993, Steven solicited a client for Jeffery but was not paid. One-third of the fee for this client would have been approximately $89,000. Steven sued Jeffrey for breach of contract. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit because the contract was illegal. Steven appealed to the Washington Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Munson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.