DaPonte v. Ocean State Job Lot, Inc.

21 A.3d 248 (2011)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DaPonte v. Ocean State Job Lot, Inc.

Rhode Island Supreme Court
21 A.3d 248 (2011)

Facts

Irene DaPonte (plaintiff) was an employee at Ocean State Job Lot, Inc. (Ocean State) (defendant). Ocean State’s president, Marc Perlman, entered the company store at which DaPonte served as an assistant manager. During a walk-through of the store, Perlman became upset with the placement of a price sticker. To express his displeasure, Perlman took the price sticker and forcefully attached it to DaPonte’s shoulder. It was undisputed that Perlman did not seek, and DaPonte did not give, consent for Perlman’s action. In response, DaPonte sued Ocean State for allegedly violating her right to privacy through an unreasonable intrusion on her physical solitude or seclusion, as stated in a Rhode Island statute. The trial court entered judgment for Ocean State, reasoning that although Perlman’s conduct was inappropriate, it did not rise to the level of an invasion of DaPonte’s right to privacy under the statute. DaPonte appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaherty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership