United States Supreme Court
509 U.S. 137 (1993)
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides mortgage insurance as a means of facilitating the construction of housing in poor areas. Mr. Darby (plaintiff) obtained such insurance on several occasions. HUD officials determined that Darby had violated the eligibility regulations for this financing, and notified him that it proposed to bar him from future participation in HUD procurement contracts. Darby sought a hearing, and the administrative law judge (ALJ) imposed an eighteen-month disbarment. Under HUD regulations, a hearing officer’s determination is final unless a party requests review and, within 30 days of receiving the request, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (Secretary) (defendant) decides to review the determination. Neither Darby nor HUD sought administrative review of the ALJ’s decision. Darby filed a suit in federal district court, seeking a declaration that the imposition of the penalty was “not in accordance with law,” as required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). HUD moved to dismiss on the ground that Darby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The court denied HUD’s motion, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.