Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School District

767 F.3d 764 (2014)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
767 F.3d 764 (2014)

JL

Facts

Live Oak High School (the school) had a Cinco de Mayo celebration on May 5 each year. Unfortunately, the school had a history of violence among students, including gang violence and race-based attacks. In 2009, an altercation between a group of Caucasian students and a group of Mexican students occurred during the Cinco de Mayo celebration. The Caucasian students had put up an American flag on campus. One student, M.D. (plaintiff), wore American flag clothing that day and was involved in another altercation with a Mexican student. The following year, another group of Caucasian students wore American flag clothing on Cinco de Mayo. This group included M.D., D.G., and D.M. (plaintiffs). Assistant Principal Miguel Rodriguez (defendant) was notified of safety concerns for the plaintiffs by several groups of students. Rodriguez met with the plaintiffs and disclosed his concern for their safety. One of the plaintiffs and another student were wearing less prominent American flag imagery and were allowed to return to class. School officials determined that the plaintiff and the other student were less likely to be singled out and targeted based on their clothing. The other plaintiffs wearing flag apparel were required to either turn their shirts inside out or go home for the day as an excused absence. The plaintiffs decided to go home. The plaintiffs were subsequently threatened and decided to stay home the following school day as well. The plaintiffs sued the Morgan Hill Unified School District (defendant) and Rodriguez, alleging a violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The trial court granted summary judgment to Rodriguez and denied summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ claims. The plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKeown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership