Darrohn v. Hildebrand
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
615 F.3d 470 (2010)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
David and Marguerite Darrohn (debtors) filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Because their income was greater than the applicable Tennessee median income, the Darrohns were above-median-income debtors. The Darrohns intended to surrender their residence, which was mortgaged, as part of their bankruptcy plan. Therefore, the Darrohns would no longer be required to pay the mortgage. In calculating their projected disposable income, the Darrohns deducted their mortgage payments from their current monthly income even though they intended to surrender the property. The bankruptcy trustee objected to the Darrohns’ proposed plan because the Darrohns would no longer have mortgage payments once they surrendered the property. The bankruptcy court determined that the Darrohns could deduct the mortgage payments and confirmed the proposed plan. The trustee appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKeague, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.