From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Dassey v. Dittmann
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
877 F.3d 297 (2017)
In 2005 Teresa Halbach was raped and murdered, and her corpse was mutilated. Brendan Dassey (defendant), a 16-year-old with mental limitations, told investigators that he saw Halbach with his uncle, Steven Avery, before her murder. On March 1, 2006, over the course of a three-hour interview, Dassey confessed to helping Avery rape and murder Halbach. During the interview, the investigators urged Dassey to tell the truth, explaining that his honesty would set him free. Dassey changed his story multiple times over the interview, and at times, Dassey seemed to be guessing. When Dassey would give conflicting, vague, or incomplete answers, the investigators would press him for additional details or ask follow-up questions. At times, Dassey would stick to his initial story, telling the investigators that their assumptions were incorrect. At no point in the interview did the investigators raise their voices or threaten Dassey. After his confession, Dassey was convicted of participating in Halbach’s rape and murder and in the mutilation of her corpse. Dassey appealed his conviction, arguing that his confession was involuntary. The Wisconsin state courts upheld his conviction, holding that his confession was voluntary. A federal district court reversed the state courts, holding that the state court decisions were unreasonable and that Dassey was entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court. The Wisconsin state government (plaintiff) appealed, and the Seventh Circuit granted a hearing en banc.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
Dissent (Wood, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.