Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Supreme Court of the United States
539 U.S. 23 (2003)


Facts

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (Fox) (defendant) had been granted exclusive television rights to the book Crusade in Europe. Fox produced a television series with the same title in 1949. The series entered the public domain in 1977 after its copyright expired. Fox reacquired the television rights to the book in 1988, and this included exclusive rights to the old television series. Dastar Corporation (Dastar) used the original version of the Crusade in Europe series to make its own series called World War II Campaigns in Europe. Dastar edited the original series and did not provide any attributing credit to Fox. Fox sued Dastar in 1998 on the grounds that Dastar violated copyright law by not giving proper credit to Fox and violated the Lanham Act under the theory of reverse passing off. The district court found that Dastar had infringed on Fox’s copyright and trademark and granted Fox’s summary judgment motion. The district court stated that the test for copyright and trademark infringement centered on whether Dastar’s actions would likely deceive or confuse the public. Dastar appealed this decision. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s trademark-infringement decision on the theory of reverse passing off but reversed and remanded the copyright ruling as requiring a separate analysis. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on the trademark infringement decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.