Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Supreme Court of the United States
539 U.S. 23 (2003)
- Written by Emily Houde, JD
Facts
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (Fox) (defendant) had been granted exclusive television rights to the book Crusade in Europe. Fox produced a television series with the same title in 1949. The series entered the public domain in 1977 after its copyright expired. Fox reacquired the television rights to the book in 1988, and this included exclusive rights to the old television series. Dastar Corporation (Dastar) used the original version of the Crusade in Europe series to make its own series called World War II Campaigns in Europe. Dastar edited the original series and did not provide any attributing credit to Fox. Fox sued Dastar in 1998 on the grounds that Dastar violated copyright law by not giving proper credit to Fox and violated the Lanham Act under the theory of reverse passing off. The district court found that Dastar had infringed on Fox’s copyright and trademark and granted Fox’s summary judgment motion. The district court stated that the test for copyright and trademark infringement centered on whether Dastar’s actions would likely deceive or confuse the public. Dastar appealed this decision. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s trademark-infringement decision on the theory of reverse passing off but reversed and remanded the copyright ruling as requiring a separate analysis. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on the trademark infringement decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.