Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
36 F.3d 1147, 32 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385 (1994)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Data General Corp. (DG) (plaintiff) manufactured computer systems, including MV computers, DG’s most technologically sophisticated line. DG also provided services for the maintenance and repair of its own computer equipment—a field in which it competed with other companies. Initially, DG allowed or even encouraged competing companies to make use of DG diagnostic protocols. But eventually, DG began to restrict the use of its materials by competitors—especially DG’s Advanced Diagnostic Executive System (ADEX), a copyrighted software for diagnosing problems with MV computers. However, Grumman Systems Support Corp. (Grumman) (defendant), a provider of repair services for DG computers, continued making unauthorized use of ADEX. DG brought suit against Grumman in federal district court, alleging both copyright infringement and appropriation of trade secrets. Grumman countered by accusing DG of willfully maintaining a monopoly over aftermarket services for DG computers in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act. DG moved for summary judgment with respect to the antitrust issue. The district court granted the motion. Grumman appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stahl, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.