David Metzger Trust v. Commissioner

76 T.C. 42, 80-84 (1981), 693 F.2d 459 (1982)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

David Metzger Trust v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
76 T.C. 42, 80-84 (1981), 693 F.2d 459 (1982)

Facts

David Metzger Trust (trust) (plaintiff) was a shareholder in Metzger Dairies, Inc. (corporation) (plaintiff), both of which were created by the late David Metzger. The beneficiaries of the trust were David’s wife and his three children—Jacob, Catherine, and Cecelia. Jacob ran the corporation, and his sisters were directors. Due to family disagreements, the siblings decided to end their joint ownership of the corporation. The agreed-upon plan was for the corporation to redeem the shares of Catherine, Cecelia, and the trust. Cecelia received a promissory note from the corporation to pay for her shares in three annual installments along with accrued interest. Cecelia reported interest income in those three years; the corporation deducted the interest liability. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed deficiencies against the corporation and the trust. The trust and the corporation appealed to the United States Tax Court, which ruled in favor of the commissioner. The trust and the corporation then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership