Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

David P. Hoult v. Jennifer Hoult

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
157 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 1998)


Facts

Jennifer Hoult (defendant) (Jennifer) filed a lawsuit against her father, David P. Hoult (plaintiff) (David), that alleged her father had sexually abused and raped her when she was young. Since the statute of limitations had run, Jennifer had to show that her memory of the alleged abuse and rape had been repressed until her recent therapy sessions. Dr. Brandt appeared as an expert witness and testified that repression occurred after repeated acts of sexual abuse. Jennifer testified about five specific times her father raped her. The jury rejected the statute of limitations defense, essentially finding that Jennifer had repressed memories, and in favor of Jennifer. David appealed but his appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution. After the jury verdict, Jennifer sent letters to several professional associations stating that her father raped her. David sued Jennifer for defamation based on the charge of rape in the letters. Jennifer moved to dismiss the defamation charge on collateral estoppel grounds, arguing that the jury in the earlier trial had determined that her father raped her so he could not relitigate that issue. The district court first denied Jennifer’s motion to dismiss but later granted her motion and dismissed David’s defamation suit. David appealed, arguing that the jury never determined that he committed rape. The appellate court found that David’s suit was barred by collateral estoppel and affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the defamation charges against Jennifer.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.