David v. Heckler

591 F. Supp. 1033 (1984)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

David v. Heckler

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
591 F. Supp. 1033 (1984)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Joseph David’s (plaintiff) wife received cancer treatment covered by Medicare Part B. Group Health Incorporated (GHI), the private insurance company administering Medicare Part B for David’s wife, approved only partial reimbursement for the cancer treatment services. David challenged the underpayment through GHI’s internal claim review system. After review, David received a review determination letter affirming the underpayment; however, the letter did not contain any specific justifications for the underpayment. At the time, GHI underpaid approximately 83 percent of all eligible Medicare reimbursement claims it processed. David sued GHI and Margaret Heckler, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the government) (defendant), arguing that the Medicare claim processing procedures violated the due-process rights of Medicare beneficiaries. At trial, David’s expert submitted unchallenged testimony that, although most Medicare beneficiaries read at or below the eighth-grade level, most coverage letters were written for expert readers and featured Medicare jargon that was incomprehensible to laypersons.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weinstein, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership