Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I

747 S.W.2d 373 (1988)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I

Texas Supreme Court
747 S.W.2d 373 (1988)

Play video

Facts

Dr. Davidow (defendant) and Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I (Inwood) (plaintiff) entered into a five-year lease for space to be used as a doctor’s office. The lease stated that Inwood would provide for air conditioning, electricity, hot water, and general maintenance services. During the lease, the premises often had a leaky roof, creating mold and mildew problems in the office. The premises also had a rodent problem, and many lights in the hallways were left unreplaced by Inwood. With fourteen months remaining on the lease, Dr. Davidow vacated the premises and refused to make further rent payments. Inwood brought suit against Dr. Davidow, and the trial court held that the premises were not suitable for a doctor’s office. Damages were awarded to Dr. Davidow for costs associated with moving his practice. Inwood appealed, with the court of appeals ruling that Inwood was entitled to back rent. Dr. Davidow petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Spears, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership