Davidson Brothers, Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
643 A.2d 642 (1994)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Davidson Brothers (Davidson) (plaintiff) operated a supermarket on a tract of land in downtown New Brunswick (George Street) and later acquired a second supermarket about two miles away. The next year, Davidson closed the George Street location because of lost sales to Davidson’s new grocery store. Davidson sold George Street to D. Katz & Sons (Katz), subject to a covenant that prohibited anyone from using the property as a grocery store. The closing of George Street as a grocery store created significant hardships for downtown residents who did not have access to cars and could not get to the other Davidson grocery store. George Street was the only area downtown suitable for a grocery store. As a result, the New Brunswick Housing Authority (NBHA) acquired the George Street property and leased it to C-Town for one dollar a year, provided that C-Town used it as a grocery store. Davidson then brought suit against Katz, NBHA, and C-Town (defendants) to specifically enforce the covenant in the deed to Katz. The trial court awarded summary judgment to the defendants. The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division affirmed. Davidson petitioned the New Jersey Supreme Court for reversal, which was granted. The case was remanded for a new trial to determine the reasonableness of the covenant. On remand, the trial court ruled in favor of the defendants, finding that the covenant was unreasonable. Davidson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (D’Annunzio, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.