Davidson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
2018 U.S. Claims LEXIS 801 (2018)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
In 1996, Robert Davidson (plaintiff), a sculptor, completed a replica of the Lady Liberty statue in New York for a casino. The replica largely copied the original statue, but Davidson intentionally altered the face of Lady Liberty to create a softer, more feminine look, which was based on a photograph of his mother-in-law. Indeed, the differences in facial features between the replica and original were plainly visually observable. In 2008, the United States Postal Service (defendant) sought to replace the image on its Forever Stamp. The Postal Service wanted to use a patriotic icon for its stamp, and Terry McCaffrey oversaw choosing the new image. Ultimately, McCaffrey selected what he believed to be a photo of the face of the Lady Liberty statue in New York for the new Forever Stamp. In reality, the photo selected was a picture of Davidson’s replica. McCaffrey purchased a license to use the image from Getty Images on behalf of the Postal Service. McCaffrey made no alterations to the photo other than sizing and cropping it to fit on a postage stamp. After the stamp was released for sale, the Postal Service learned that the photo was of the replica. One Postal Service employee wrote that it was “quite apparent” that the photo was of the replica after looking at the photo. Additionally, several other employees reacted positively to the stamp because it was different from the 23 other Lady Liberty stamps. After learning of the use of his photo, Davidson filed a copyright application for the sculpture, which was granted in 2013. Davidson filed an action against the Postal Service for copyright infringement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bruggink, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.