Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Davis v. Alaska

United States Supreme Court
415 U.S. 308 (1974)


Facts

Davis (defendant) was charged with the theft of a safe containing over $1,000 from a bar in Anchorage, Alaska on February 16, 1970. The empty safe was discovered outside of the city later that day. Sixteen-year-old Richard Green lived nearby and told police that he had seen two Negro men standing by a car near where the safe was found and that one of the men had a crowbar. Green identified Davis as one of the men. Green had a juvenile criminal record for burglary and was on probation at the time of the investigation. Prior to trial, the state moved for a protective order to prevent Davis from questioning Green about his juvenile record. Davis responded that he planned to use the juvenile record only to show that Green was on probation during the investigation and not as a general impeachment of Green’s character. Davis planned to then argue at trial that Green might have felt pressure to identify Davis in order to shift any suspicion away from Green or out of fear that Green’s probation might be revoked if he did not satisfy the police. The trial court granted the protective order based upon state laws that prohibited the use of juvenile adjudications against an individual in future proceedings. During trial, Davis cross-examined Green about his state of mind during the investigation and specifically asked Green if he had ever been questioned like that before by the police. Green responded in the negative, and the judge prevented further questioning. Davis was convicted and appealed. The Alaska Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, holding that Davis had a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine Green on bias and motive without using the juvenile record. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Stewart, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (White, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.