Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Davis v. Boeheim

Court of Appeals of New York
22 N.E.3d 999 (N.Y. 2015)


Facts

Bernie Fine was the associate head coach of the men’s basketball team at Syracuse University (university) (defendant). Following several reports by media outlets that Fine had sexually molested Robert Davis and his stepbrother, Michael Lang (plaintiffs), over a 20-year period, the university’s head basketball coach, James Boeheim (defendant), made statements defending Fine, his colleague and long-time friend. Specifically, Boeheim issued a written statement and later verbally reiterated that a five-month internal investigation found that the plaintiffs had lied about the alleged molestation and merely sought to financially profit from the claims. Additionally, Boeheim denied any knowledge of the claimed events and further asserted that the plaintiffs had lied about Boeheim seeing the plaintiffs in Fine’s hotel room during the 1987 Final Four men’s basketball tournament. Boeheim’s statements were subsequently printed in several news articles. The plaintiffs filed suit against Boeheim and the university, claiming that the printed statements had caused them economic, emotional, and reputational harm. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the claims were nonactionable opinion and not facts. The trial court agreed and granted the defendants’ motion. The plaintiffs appealed. The appellate division affirmed. The Court of Appeals of New York granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rivera, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.