Davis v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 1978-12 (1978)
Davis (plaintiff) was laid off and elected to receive severance pay. Davis made her election in November 1974. Davis’s former employer told her that it would take two months for the money to arrive. The employer sent the money earlier than expected but did not inform Davis of the earlier-than-planned arrival. A mail carrier attempted to deliver the check on December 31, 1974, but Davis was not home. Davis received the check on January 2, 1975. Davis did not include the income in her 1974 income tax return, planning instead to include it in her 1975 return. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that Davis should have reported the income on her 1974 income tax return. Davis appealed the decision in United States Tax Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.