Davis v. Davis

2009 Slip Opinion 08579 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Davis v. Davis

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
2009 Slip Opinion 08579 (2009)

Facts

Noel Davis (plaintiff) commenced a divorce proceeding against her husband, Shepherd Davis, (defendant) in November 2007. Before the complaint was filed in January 2008, the parties had been married for 41 years and resided in the same apartment. Noel’s complaint alleged one cause asserting cruel and inhuman treatment under New York Domestic Relations Law Section 170(1) and one cause asserting constructive abandonment under New York Domestic Relations Law Section 170(2). The complaint alleged Shepherd refused to engage in social interactions with Noel by refusing to celebrate holidays like Christmas, Thanksgiving, and Valentine’s Day with Noel. Shepherd also allegedly refused to attend social and family functions with Noel. The complaint also alleged Shepherd left Noel alone in a hospital emergency room on at least one occasion, removed her belongings from the master bedroom, and ignored her. The trial court granted Shepherd’s motion to dismiss Noel’s cause of action seeking a divorce on the ground of social abandonment. The trial court found the social-abandonment allegation failed to support a cognizable legal theory. Noel appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dillon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership