Davis v. Department of Employment Security

737 P.2d 1262 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Davis v. Department of Employment Security

Washington Supreme Court
737 P.2d 1262 (1987)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Karen Davis (plaintiff) and Andrew Stephens were romantically involved for six years but had never married. Throughout the relationship, Davis worked and lived in Tacoma, Washington, and Stephens lived in Port Angeles, Washington. Davis requested that her employer, Equifax Corporation, transfer her from the Tacoma branch to the Port Angeles branch so that she could live with Stephens. The request was denied, and Davis quit her job to move in with Stephens. After Davis quit, she filed for unemployment benefits with the state’s Department of Employment Security (department) (defendant). The department denied her benefits on the ground that she had voluntarily quit working without good cause. In response, Davis filed a lawsuit against the department. Davis argued that she should receive benefits pursuant to exception RCW 50.20.050(4), under which one may access benefits if his or her marital status was the reason for leaving the workforce. Davis also argued that applying the exception only to married persons was discriminatory against nonmarried individuals living in meretricious relationships and was therefore violative of her equal-protection rights. The county court denied her appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership