Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
D

Davis v. New York City Housing Authority

278 F.3d 64 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Davis v. New York City Housing Authority

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
278 F.3d 64 (2002)

DD

Facts

Pauline Davis (plaintiff) filed suit against the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (defendant) for violating the Fair Housing Act. Davis alleged that in accepting tenants for public housing, NYCHA discriminated against Latinos and African Americans on the basis of race. The case was settled by a consent decree. The consent decree created a tenant selection-and-assignment plan that contained certain eligibility standards. Several years later, NYCHA proposed to add a working-family preference to the eligibility standards. Davis opposed the working-family preference due to concerns that it would perpetuate racial segregation by favoring White families. Davis filed suit to enjoin NYCHA from implementing the working-family preference. The district court found that the working-family preference would perpetuate segregation at 20 NYCHA housing projects and enjoined its implementation at those projects. NYCHA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Property

Key Terms