Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Davis v. New York City Housing Authority

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
278 F.3d 64 (2002)


Facts

Pauline Davis (plaintiff) filed suit against the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (defendant) for violating the Fair Housing Act. Davis alleged that in accepting tenants for public housing, NYCHA discriminated against Latinos and African Americans on the basis of race. The case was settled by a consent decree. The consent decree created a tenant selection-and-assignment plan that contained certain eligibility standards. Several years later, NYCHA proposed to add a working-family preference to the eligibility standards. Davis opposed the working-family preference due to concerns that it would perpetuate racial segregation by favoring White families. Davis filed suit to enjoin NYCHA from implementing the working-family preference. The district court found that the working-family preference would perpetuate segregation at 20 NYCHA housing projects and enjoined its implementation at those projects. NYCHA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial