Davis v. Peachtree City

304 S.E.2d 701 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Davis v. Peachtree City

Georgia Supreme Court
304 S.E.2d 701 (1983)

SH

Facts

Melvin Davis (defendant) was president of a chain of convenience stores called Kwickie Food Stores and held a retail wine license at his Peachtree City store location. Davis was charged with selling alcoholic beverages to a minor when an employee at this location sold wine to an underaged customer. Although it was undisputed that Davis had no knowledge of and did not authorize the sale, he was nevertheless convicted of the crime by way of a city ordinance that made the holder of a city liquor license subject to vicarious criminal liability “for the conduct or actions of his employees while in his employment.” Davis was fined $200 and given 60 days in jail, with the confinement to be suspended contingent upon payment of the fine and Davis never again violating the laws of Georgia. Davis appealed his conviction, arguing that these ordinances violated the due-process clauses of the Georgia and United States Constitutions because the ordinances provided for the automatic imposition of vicarious criminal liability for actions of his employees that were done without his knowledge, consent, or authorization and that were not the result of negligence attributable to him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership