Davis v. Ross
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
107 F.R.D. 326 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)
Gail Davis (plaintiff) was employed by Diana Ross (defendant) and Davis claimed that she voluntarily resigned. However, Ross disseminated a letter insinuating that Davis was fired because her work and/or personal habits were not acceptable to Ross and stating that Ross would not recommend Davis for other work. Davis brought suit for defamation, seeking to recover for “great mental pain and anguish” among other things. The district court granted Ross’s motion to dismiss, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded. On remand, Davis filed a motion to discover (1) information about Ross’s net worth for purposes of punitive damages, (2) the amount of fees paid to Ross’s lawyer for purposes of establishing bias, as the lawyer was to be a witness for Ross, and (3) the names of other Ross employees who had complained about her. Ross filed a motion to discover evidence of Davis’s treatment by a psychiatrist while Davis worked for Ross, arguing that Davis put her mental condition at issue when she asked to recover for mental pain and anguish.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.