Davis v. State
Georgia Supreme Court
422 S.E.2d 546 (1992)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Darrin Davis was a 10-year-old boy who routinely was home alone after school. Darrin had a key to the house but was not allowed to invite anyone into the house or to play outside while home alone. Darrin’s mother had instructed Darrin to call 911 if he ever needed help in an emergency. One day Darrin found drugs in the bedroom belonging to his mother and stepfather, Freddie Ray Davis (defendant). Based on information from drug-abuse-prevention programs at school, Darrin called 911 about the drugs, attempting to get help for his parents. When a police officer arrived at the house, Darrin brought her into the house and into his parents’ bedroom, where he showed her white powder and a razor blade on a mirror and a bag of marijuana and rolling papers. The officer took the drugs to her patrol car and waited with Darrin outside the house until Darrin’s mother came home. When Darrin’s mother arrived, she consented to a search of her handbag, which contained additional drugs, and was arrested. Darrin’s mother and Davis refused to give consent to search their home, however. Davis was arrested and charged with drug-related crimes. The trial court refused to suppress the evidence seized in the home. Davis was convicted and appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the conviction, and the Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari on the issue of whether the consent to search given by Darrin was valid.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sears-Collins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.