Davis v. Washington
United States Supreme Court
547 U.S. 813 (2006)
[Editor’s note: This case was decided along with Hammon v. Indiana] In Davis v. Washington, a 911 operator answered a call from Michelle McCottry, who was in the midst of a physical fight with her boyfriend, Adrian Davis (defendant). McCottry was frantic and in response to the 911 operator’s questions, identified Davis as the person who was beating her. Davis was charged with felony violation of a domestic no-contact order. At trial, the recording of the 911 call was admitted into evidence, over Davis’s objections. The jury convicted Davis, and he appealed. The lower appellate court and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed. In Hammon v. Indiana, police responded to a report of a domestic disturbance at the home of Amy and Hershel Hammon (defendant). Amy Hammon greeted them, looking frightened but denying that anything was the matter. She gave them permission to enter the house, whereupon the police saw a broken furnace. One of the police officers remained with Hershel Hammon while the other officer questioned Amy Hammon in the living room. In response to the officer’s questions, Amy Hammon wrote a statement that admitted that Hammon had broken the furnace, shoved her down into the broken glass, hit her, and threw her down. Hammon was charged with domestic battery and violating his probation. Amy Hammon did not appear at trial. The prosecution called the officer who had spoken with Amy Hammon to testify as to what she had said to him and to authenticate her affidavit. Hammon was convicted, and the conviction was affirmed by the lower appellate court and the Indiana Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in both cases.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.