Dawson v. White & Case
New York Court of Appeals
672 N.E.2d 589 (1996)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
New partners entering the White & Case law firm (firm) (defendant) paid nothing to share in the firm’s preexisting goodwill. Departing partners received no payment for their shares in that goodwill. The firm’s financial statements did not list goodwill as an asset. The firm’s partnership agreement provided that, upon a partner’s withdrawal from the firm, goodwill would be excluded from any amounts charged against or credited to the former partner’s account. Evan Dawson (plaintiff), one of the firm’s lawyers, fell out with his partners. The partners expelled Dawson by dissolving the firm and immediately reconstituting it without Dawson’s participation. Dawson successfully sued the firm for wrongful termination. In awarding damages, the trial court included an allocation for Dawson’s share of the firm’s goodwill. After an intermediate appellate court affirmed the trial court’s judgment, the firm appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ciparick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.