DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation Associates

486 F. Supp. 1273 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation Associates

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
486 F. Supp. 1273 (1980)

SH

Facts

Since 1941, DC Comics, Inc. (plaintiff) had marketed comic books featuring the Aquaman character, an unwater hero, who, with his female companion, Mera, and his walrus-like companion, Tusky, fought against assorted forces of evil. Aquaman was featured in numerous animated television series and licensed to others to market goods based on the character. Since 1967, DC Comics had marketed comics featuring the Plastic Man character, a crime-fighting hero with the abilities to stretch and assume the shape of inanimate objects that retain the color and design of his costume. Like Aquaman, Plastic Man was featured in an animated television series. In 1978, Filmation Associates began exhibiting two animated television series—Manta and Moray and Superstretch, both as part of the “Tarzan and the Super 7” series—and licensed others to market goods based on the Manta and Moray and Superstretch characters. Manta was an underwater hero, Moray his female companion, and Whiskers their walrus-like companion. And Superstretch had the same abilities as Plastic Man. Shortly thereafter, DC Comics initiated suit against Filmation for trademark infringement, among other claims. The jury found in favor of DC Comics. Filmation moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, arguing that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on DC Comics’ trademark-infringement claim because it had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (MacMahon, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership