De Avilia v. Civiletti

643 F.2d 471 (1981)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

De Avilia v. Civiletti

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
643 F.2d 471 (1981)

Facts

In 1976, Congress passed amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act (the act) that sought to eliminate differences governing immigration from the Western Hemisphere and the Eastern Hemisphere. The primary effect of the amendments was that countries in the Western Hemisphere became subject to a 20,000-visa quota per country for each fiscal year, which had previously only applied to countries from the Eastern Hemisphere. The amendments were passed in the second quarter of the 1977 fiscal year. The United States Department of State (state department) (defendant) retroactively applied the new quota limits to the beginning of the fiscal year, holding that any visas issued in that period would be counted against the country’s total visa allotment for the fiscal year. In that first quarter of the fiscal year prior to the amendments’ passage, 14,203 visas had been issued to Mexican immigrants. The state department therefore determined that only 5,797 visas were available for Mexican immigrants for the remaining three-quarters of the fiscal year. Imelda De Avilia joined with other Mexican visa applicants (the applicants) (plaintiffs) to file a class action against the state department. The applicants claimed that the retroactive application of the visa quota violated their rights and that the quota limits should have only been applied after the passage of the law. The district court agreed and held that the state department should have only issued visas under the quota on a pro rata basis after the passage of the amendments for the remainder of the fiscal year. Both the applicants and the state department appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bartels, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership