Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

De Falco v. Bernas

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
244 F.3d 286 (2d Cir. 2001)


Facts

De Falco (plaintiff) bought property in the town of Delaware and sought to get his development approved by the town. Over the course of the approval process, Dirie, the Delaware Town Supervisor, and Bernas, a construction company (defendants), used their positions and relationships with the town to engage in a series of acts designed to exert influence over De Falco’s business. This included refusal to approve De Falco’s development and extortion demands which caused De Falco to break an $8,800 contract with an out-of-state logger. Bernas also removed gravel from De Falco’s property without permission and demanded rights to De Falco’s entire gravel pit. Finally, Bernas also demanded that De Falco hand over shares to his business. De Falco handed over a third of his interest in his business, but refused to turn over the entire gravel pit. As a result, Bernas convinced the town tax assessor to more than double the assessment on De Falco’s lot, thus doubling his taxes. Finally, when De Falco asked Dirie how he could get his lot approved, Dirie stated that De Falco could give Bernas his gravel pit. De Falco brought suit against the defendants for violation of the RICO Act. The jury returned a verdict against both Dirie and Bernas. The district court vacated the jury award against Bernas, but upheld an award against Dirie. Both De Falco and Dirie appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Underhill, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.