De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States

273 U.S. 236, 47 S. Ct. 366, 71 L. Ed. 625 (1927)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States

United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 236, 47 S. Ct. 366, 71 L. Ed. 625 (1927)

Facts

The De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Company (De Forest) (plaintiff) held two patents on vacuum tubes (also known as audions) used in radio communication. De Forest granted a license to Western Electric Company, permitting the licensee to make various uses of the invention. Western Electric subsequently conveyed its rights under the license to the American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T). The government of the United States (defendant) sought to make use of the technology during the First World War. AT&T informed the government that it would allow such use but also that it would constitute infringement. AT&T stated that it would later seek a financial accounting from the government, to which the government agreed. AT&T then went to work making audions to assist the government during the war. Later, De Forest brought suit against the government for the tort of infringement. The parties agreed that both De Forest and AT&T had the right to license the use of the invention to the government. The court of claims dismissed the suit. De Forest appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taft, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership