De La Rosa v. St. Charles Gaming Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
474 F.3d 185, 2006 AMC 2997 (2006)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
St. Charles Gaming Co. (defendant) owned two floating casinos on Lake Charles, Louisiana. The casinos were built on boats that were theoretically capable of functioning as vessels but were in fact indefinitely moored to a dock, adjacent to a land-based hotel. The casinos received water, sewer lines, and technology services from land-based sources. David De La Rosa (plaintiff) was on one of the casinos when he tripped and fell. De La Rosa sued St. Charles Gaming for unseaworthiness under admiralty law and negligence. St. Charles Gaming moved for summary judgment on both counts, alleging for the unseaworthiness claim that the casino was not a vessel covered under admiralty law. The district court granted the motion and dismissed De La Rosa’s claims. De La Rosa appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Benavides, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.